The Portrayal of Women: Feminist Analysis of A Hologram for The King

Authors

  • Samal Marf Mohammed English Department, College of Basic Education, University of Raparin, Rania, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26750/Vol(8).No(4).Paper2

Abstract

This research paper attempts to investigate the representation of women, their character and their rights in Dave Eggers’ novel A Hologram for the King (2012), according to the feministic approach to literary works. Gender bias has been reflected in many literary works from classical canonical works to contemporary literary ones and has been dealt with in many critical pieces. The theme of self-objectification, which is closely tied to gender bias to some extent, has not been analyzed, independently and fully, especially in the literature of the post-colonial era. The current study scrutinizes the writer’s portrayal of women characters in order to uncover the replication of the same stereotypes and gender bias categories against women, dominant in the literary works before the post-colonial era. Based on the feminist approach, A Hologram for the King is identified as a misogynist work although it is written in postmodern era. The author of the novel, is inspired by men’s superiority, creates a completely distorted image of women by introducing them as people who turn themselves into objects of pleasure for men. The novelist further deprives women of their rights and misrepresents them as unprincipled humans, disparaging them as naïve and sexually licentious creatures. After all, this study becomes a means of writing back against marginalization of women, in their picturization and their subordination to men.

References

Bartky, Sandra Lee. (1990). Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. New York: Routledge.

Berger, J. (1972). Ways of Seeing. London, England: Penguin.

Bressler, Charles E. (2007). Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. Indiana Wesleyan University: Pearson Education, Inc.

Calogero, Rachel M, Tantleff-Dunn, Stacey and Thompson, J Kevin. (2011). Self-Objectification in Women Causes, Consequences, and Counteractions. American Psychological Association.

Cameron, Deborah. (1985). Feminism and Linguistic Theory. The Macmillan Press Ltd.

Eggers, Dave. (2012). A Hologram for the King. San Francisco: Mc Sweeney.

Moradi, Bonnie & Huang Yu-Ping, 2008, ‘OBJECTIFICATION THEORY AND PSYCHOLOGY OF WOMEN: A DECADE OF ADVANCES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS’, Psychology of Women Quarterly, vol.32, no.4, pp. 377-398

Ralph M. Nutting. (2013). Why the Catholic Church Must Change: A Necessary Conversation. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc

Ruth, Sheila. (2001). Issues in Feminism: An Introduction to Women's Studies. Mayfield Publishing Company.

Scott, Jacqueline, Crompton, Rosemary, and Clare, Lyonette. (2010). Gender Inequalities in the 21st Century: New Barriers and Continuing Constraints. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. (1999). A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Harvard: Harvard UP, Print

Warhol, Robyn R and Herndl, Diane Price. (2009). Feminisms Redux: An Analogy of Literary Theory and Criticism. Rutgers University Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-28

How to Cite

Mohammed, S. M. (2021). The Portrayal of Women: Feminist Analysis of A Hologram for The King. Journal of University of Raparin, 8(4), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.26750/Vol(8).No(4).Paper2

Issue

Section

Humanities & Social Sciences