A Comparative Study of Modern Theatrical Technicalities in The Glass Menagerie and The Cherry Orchard

  • shokhan Rasool Ahmed English Department, College of Languages, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
Keywords: The Glass Menagerie, The Cherry Orchard, Realism, and Theatrical Technicalities.

Abstract

The nineteenth Century produced some of the most complex plays that today represent modern theatrical technicalities that differed in several ways from twentieth Century plays. In the twentieth Century, Tennessee Williams was acknowledged for the diversity of genres he covered in his plays, most of which focused on the dark aspects of human experience, which lent significant technicalities to his plays, most notably, The Glass Menagerie. Similarly, Anton Chekhov is a nineteenth Century playwright who developed plays that introduced several theatrical technicalities. He was renowned for portraying realism, a feature that characterised 19th Century theatre. Chekhov’s The Cherry Orchard is a play considered the landmark of modern theatrical technicalities.

This study explores three ways in which Williams and Chekhov made The Glass Menagerie and Cherry Orchard respectively as landmarks of theatrical technicalities, i.e., the multiplicity of genres, effective use of indirect action and irony as theatrical conventions, and the integration and portrayal of nineteenth Century and twentieth Century realism. The research finds that while Williams employs a multiplicity of genres and the use of irony as the ideal theatrical conventions, Chekhov integrates all three elements to create modern theatrical technicalities that not only influence the audience's perception of the characters but also the playwright’s intention.

This study is important for both undergraduate and postgraduate readers as it can enrich a reader’s thinking about different theatrical techniques and conventions used in both plays.

References

Abidi, S. A., (2013). Mulitiplicity of meanings in Chekhov‘s The Cherry Orchard. Lapis Lazuli -An International Literary Journal (LLILJ), 3(1).
Beckerman, B., (1971). Dramatic analysis and literary interpretation: The cherry orchard as exemplum. New Literary History, 2(3), pp. 391-406.
Bonyadi, A. R., (2012). Previous, Present and Future Characters in ‘Cherry Orchard’Play. Journal of American Science, 8(3), pp. 9-14.
Chen, Y., (2019). Time and Memory in The Cherry Orchard. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(5).
Dykes, S., (2016). STRANGE FRUIT, Chekhov’s The Cherry Orchard in the Deep South. Stanislavski Studies, 4(2), pp. 185-203.
Eliott, K., (2013). The Glass Menagerie by Tennessee Williams (review). Educational Theatre Journal, 65(4), pp. 584-585.
Evdokimova, S., (2000). What's so Funny about Losing One's Estate, or Infantilism in “The Cherry Orchard”. The Slavic and East European Journal, 44(4), pp. 623-648.
Griffin, B., 2007. The Cherry Orchard. Theatre Journal, 59(1), pp. 127-129.
Guan, Y., Jia, L. & Gao, Y., (2016). Fragile as Escaping into the Glass World—Analysis of The Glass Menagerie from the Perspective of Cognitive Domains. Advances in Literary Study, 4(4), pp. 67-76.
Latham, J. E., (1958). The Cherry Orchard as Comedy. Educational Theatre Journal, 10(1), pp. 21-29.
Loehlin, J. N., (2006). Chekhov: The Cherry Orchard. s.l.:Cambridge University Press.
Storm, W., (2011). Irony and the Modern Theatre. s.l.:Cambridge University Press.
Williams, T. & Walker, K., (2019). The Glass Menagerie. s.l.:New Directions.
Young, S., (2007). A Blind Spot: Chekhov's Deepest Horizons. Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism, 21(1), pp. 65-78.
Published
2021-06-13
How to Cite
Ahmed, shokhan. (2021). A Comparative Study of Modern Theatrical Technicalities in The Glass Menagerie and The Cherry Orchard. Journal of University of Raparin, 8(2), 192-204. https://doi.org/10.26750/Vol(8).No(2).Paper_9
Section
Humanities & Social Sciences