Intertextual Context in Kurdish Political Discourse, with Reference to Referendum Discourse

Authors

  • Srwa Faisal Azeez Kurdish Department, Faculty of Arts, Soran University, Soran, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
  • Dyar Ali Kamal School of Foreign languages, Peking University, Chinese

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26750/Vol(11).No(2).Paper27

Keywords:

Discourse, Critical Discourse Analysis, Interpretation, Intertextual Context, Referendum Discourse .

Abstract

This study is entitled "Intertextual Context in Kurdish Political Discourse, with Reference to Referendum Discourse". Intertextual context is Norman Fairclough’s perspective in critical discourse analysis which is concerned with explaining the sources of discourse production. It highlights what these sources are and where they relate to other texts. This subject is at the second level of critical discourse analysis which is known as discourse interpretation level. It is a significant part which aims at reaching the common knowledge sources of discourse participants via interpreting the intertextual context of a given discourse. The aim is to achieve a common interpretation, for, in this regard; any discourse or linguistic act is in a deep relationship with some other texts. The current study is an attempt to interpret and to a large extent identify the sources of the referendum discourse (the whole face to face speeches of Massoud Barzani, Chairman of the High Council for Referendum). This study employs the descriptive analysis method. It, first, presents Fairclough’s view on intertextual context. Then, the depicted examples of this are presented in the referendum discourse.

References

روث فوداك، ميشيل ماير، 2014، مناهج التحليل النقدي، ترجمة: حسام أحمد فرج، عزة شبل محمد، الطبعة الاولى، المركز القومي للترجمة، القاهرة.

نورمان فيركلف، 2015، الخطاب والتغير الاجتماعي، ترجمة: محمج عنانى، الطبعة الاولى، المركز القومي للترجمة، القاهرة.

نورمان فيركلف، 2016، اللغة والسلطة، ترجمة: محمد عنانى، الطبعة الاولى، المركز القومي للترجمة، القاهرة.

دان سبيربر، ديدري ولسون، 2016، نظرية الصلة أو المناسبة، ترجمة: هشام أبراهيم عبدالله، الطبعة الاولى، دار الكتاب الجديد المتحدة.

Fairclough, N. 1989: Language and power, London, Longman.

Fairclough, N.1992: Discourse and Social Change. 1st Edition, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Flowerdew, J., Richardson, J. E. 2018: The Handbook Of Critical Discourse Studies, London and New York: Rotledge.

Foucault, M. 1972: The Archaeology of knowledge, London: Tavistock publications.

Kristeva, J. 1986: The Kristeva reader, Edited by: Moi, T., New York: Colombia University Press.

Trask, R. L. 1997: A Student's Dictionary of Language and Linguistic

Van Dijk, T. 2012: Structures of Discourse and Structures of Power, In Anderson, J. A. (ed.), Communication yearbook 12, Routledge.وتاری شاری ئاکرێ، 13/9/2017 ، https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gx72Fl6g8zM

وتاری شاری زاخۆ ، 14/9/2017 ، https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKYW8wpiHHs

وتاری شاری ئامێدی، 15/9/2017 ، https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYMpcGltUGE

وتاری شاری دهۆک، 16/9/2017 ، https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3t32sV-FuDQ

وتاری شاری سۆران، 19/9/2017 ، https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKX458w3goc

وتاری شاری سلێمانی، 20/9/2017 ، https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUBWlAc6UdU

وتاری شاری هەولێر، 22/9/2017 ، https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUBWlAc6UdU

Published

2024-07-09

How to Cite

Faisal Azeez, S., & Ali Kamal, D. (2024). Intertextual Context in Kurdish Political Discourse, with Reference to Referendum Discourse. Journal of University of Raparin, 11(2), 676–689. https://doi.org/10.26750/Vol(11).No(2).Paper27

Issue

Section

Humanities & Social Sciences