Gender Differences in the Speech Events of Kurdistan Parliament

Authors

  • Dlvin Abdullah Sadiq Department of English, College of Languages - Salahaddin University-Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
  • Salam Nihma Hakeem Department of English, College of Education, Salahaddin University- Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

Keywords:

Gender differences, Language, Speech event, Parliament

Abstract

This study tackles the differences between male and female MPs’ language in Kurdistan Parliament and the reasons behind such differences. The study investigates the extent and the type of gender differences between male and female MPs in Kurdistan and how these differences may lead to misunderstandings while debating. . In addition, the study highlights the MPs’ perspective on gender stereotypes and how such perspectives may affect their interactions. A quantitative method has been used to analyze the data of the study. First, an ethnographic description of Kurdistan Parliament according to Hymes's speaking framework was given, focusing on the setting, the participants and the act sequence. Second, a questionnaire was prepared as the data collection tool of the study. Based on the analysis of the collected data, it was found out that both male and female MPs strongly agreed that gender differences in language use could lead to misunderstandings. Moreover, MPs confirmed that the Kurdish society is patriarchal, and this leads to male dominance in most of the social interactions including parliamentary debates.

References

Coates, J. (2013). Women men and Language: a Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language, Oxon: Routledge.

Gumperz .J, and Hymes D., (1991) (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, New York: Basil Blackwell.

Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Hokmes, J. and Meyerhof , M. (2003). The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

(2006). Gendered Talk at Work: Constructing Gender Identity through Workplace Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.

Hymes, D. (1974). Ways of speaking, in R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (eds.), Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking

Jespersen, O. (1992).Language; It is Nature, Development and Origin. London: George Allen and Unwin.

Kiesling, S., (2019). Langue, Gender and Sexuality, New York: Rutledge.

Kurdistan of Parliament Federal Republic of Iraq: Role and Procedures of the Kurdistan Parliament. [ONLINE] available at https://www.parliament.krd/english/about-parliament/role-and-procedures/ [Accessed 6 Jun , 2019]

Maltz, D. N. and Borker, R. A. (2006). “A Cultural Approach to Male-Female Miscommunication”.In Language and social Identity, edited by John J. Gumperz. Cambridge University Press

Paulston, C., Kiesling, S. and Rangel, E. (2012).The Handbook of Intercultural Discourse and Communication. Malden: Blackwell.

Spolsky, B., (2004) Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

The Kurdistan Regional Government: The Kurdistan Parliament.2017. [ONLINE] available at http://previous.cabinet.gov.krd/p/page.aspx?l=12&p=229[Accessed 21 August 2019].

Sunderland, J. (2006). Gendered Discourses. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Tannen, D (2004). You Just don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation, 7th ed.New York: William Morrow

Wardhaugh, R. 2010. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics, 6thed. Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-10

How to Cite

Sadiq, D. A., & Hakeem, S. N. (2019). Gender Differences in the Speech Events of Kurdistan Parliament. Journal of University of Raparin, 7(1), 80–94. Retrieved from https://journal.uor.edu.krd/index.php/JUR/article/view/Paper7

Issue

Section

Humanities & Social Sciences