Selection of the most Suitable Site for Dam Construction in Pishdar (AHP). District Using the Analytical Pyramid Process (AHP)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26750/d483qr98Keywords:
Pishdar District, The Most Suitable Dam Sites, GIS Technology ,Pyramid Analysis (AHP).Abstract
This study paper looks into the assessment of dam construction and the spatial distribution of suggested dams in the Pishdar District through using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Geographically speaking, Pishdar district is located in the eastern part of the Kurdistan Region and the northeastern part of Sulaymaniyah Province. However, the district extends between latitudes 36° 32′ 0″–36° 06′ 0″ N and longitudes 45° 20′ 0″–44° 54′ 0″ E, with a total area of 1,331.4 km². As a matter of fact, due to the population growth, the need for water has been increasing significantly, and on the other hand climate including rising temperatures, irregular rainfall, and frequent droughts, groundwater levels are dropping, seasonal rivers and canals are shrinking and drying up along with the Iran’s policies on governing the groundwater in the region have further made the situation worse. Most importantly, these factors highlight the necessity of this research. The objectives of this study paper are to determine suitable locations for dam construction, as well as to assess the characteristics and water storage capacities of the proposed dams and estimate the potential water inflow.
At the end of our research paper, we reached a number of findings, the most important finding is that both natural and human factors in the region are favorable for dam construction. According to the AHP model, six locations were identified as the most suitable sites for dams. Their suitability levels were classified as very suitable, suitable, somewhat suitable, or less suitable. Importantly, no site was categorized as completely unsuitable for dam construction.
References
محمدأمین، هاوڕێ یاسین، 2015، جوگرافیاى دهرامهته سروشتییهكان، چاپخانهى تاران، ناوهندى غهزهلنوس، سلێمانى.
زهنگهنه، اكرام حسن أمین، 2018، دهروازهیهك بۆ جوگرافیاى سروشتى، چاپى دوهم، چاپخانهى تاران.
سورداشى، عهلى محمود ئهسعهد، 1998، جیۆلۆجیاى ههریمى كوردستان، جوگرافیاى ههرێمى كوردستانى عێراق، كتێبى سهنتهرى برایهتى، ژماره (3)، چاپخانهى وهزارهتى پهروهردهى ههرێمى كوردستانى عێراق، چاپى یهكهم، ههولێر.
صالح، صمد عبدالله، 2024، دهرامهتى ئاو له ئاوزێڵى ڕوبارى ڕۆخانه و چۆنیهتى پهرهپێدانى (لێكۆڵینهوهیهكى هایدرۆلۆجى)، تێزى دكتۆرا (بڵاونهكراوه)، زانكۆى كۆیه، فاكهڵتى پهروهرده.
دهرویش، عزالدین جمعه، ئومید حمه باقى حمهامین، 2022، دیاریكردنى گونجاوترین جێگه بۆ دروستكردنى بهنداو لهقهزاى سهیدصادق به بهكارهێنانى سیستهمى زانیارییه جوگرافییهكان، گۆڤارى زانكۆى گهرمیان، ژمارهى تایبهت، دهیهمین كۆنفرانسى زانستى وشكهساڵى و بهڕێوهبردنى كهمى ئاو.
حكومهتى ههرێمى كوردستان، وهزارهتى گواستنهوهو گهیاندن، بهڕێوهبهرایهتى كهشناسى و بومهلهرزهزانى سلێمانى، داتاى تۆماركراوى (بڵاونهكراوه)ى، وێستگهى كهشناسى (ههڵشۆ)، ماوهى نێوان (2015 – 2024).
حكومهتى ههرێمى كوردستان، وهزارهتى گواستنهوه و گهیاندن، بهڕێوهبهرایهتى كهشناسى و بومهلهرزهزانى سلێمانى، داتاى تۆماركراوى (بڵاونهكراوه)ى وێستگهى كهشناسى (دوكان)، ماوهى نێوان(2000 – 2024).
حكومهتى ههرێمى كوردستان، وهزارهتى كشتوكاڵ و سهرچاوهكانى ئاو، بهڕێوهبهرایهتى گشتى بهنداو كۆگاكانى ئاو، بهشى پلان، زانیارى بڵاونهكراوه. 2025
جمهورى اسلامى ایران، شبكة اب و هوا شناسى سردشت، اطلاعات زخیرة كندة (بخش نشدة)، بین(2000 – 2024).
حداد، هاشم یاسین حمدأمین، سهردار محمد عبدالرحمن، هۆشیار مجمدأمین خۆشناو، 2009، ئهتڵهسى ههرێمى كوردستانى عێراق و جیهان، چاپى یهكهم، ههولێر.
چاوپێكهوتن لهگهڵ بهڕێز. رهحمان خانى، بهڕێوهبهرى گشتى بهنداو و كۆگانى ئاوى ههرێمى كوردستان، له ڕێكەوتی (12/10/2025)
حكیم، علا على سراج، صارة الحبیب ورغى، 2022، دمج تقنیة نظم المعلومات الجغرافیة وعلمیة التحلیل الهرمى لتحدید أنسب الموقع للسدود فى حوض وادى نعمان بمدینة مكة مكرمة، المجلة العربیة للعلوم ونشر الأبحاث، المجلد(8) العدد(2).
خلوف، علاء، صفوان على محمد، وسیم المسبر، 2019، استخدام النمذجة الریاضیةAHPونظم المعلومات الجغرافیة GISفى تقییم ملاءمة الأراضى لزراعة القمع فى وسط سوریا، المجلة الأردنیة فى العلوم الزراعیة، المجلد (15)، العدد (2).
ال سلیمان، فایز بن محمد، 2019، استخدام تقنیات الاستشعار عن بعد ونظم المعلومات الجغرافیة فى تقییم مواضع السدود لتنمیة حصاد المیاه في منطقة عسیر بالمملكة العربیة السعودیة، مجلة جامعة الملك خالد، عدد(17).
Saaty, and Luis G. Vargas, 2022, Models and Methods, Concepts Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy process. Second Edition.
Buring, P. (1960) Soil conditions in Iraq. Republic of Iraq: Directorate General of Agricultural Research and Projects.
Dai, X. (2016) Dam site selection using an integrated method of AHP and GIS for decision-making support in Bortala, Northwest China. Master’s thesis. Lund University, Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Sweden.
Jozaghi, A., Alizadeh, B., Hatami, M., Flood, I., Khorrami, M., Khodaei, N. and Ghasemitousi, E. (2018) ‘A comparative study of the AHP and TOPSIS techniques for dam site selection using GIS: A case study of Sistan and Baluchestan Province, Iran’, Geosciences, 8(494).
Morain, S.A. (1999) GIS solutions in natural resource management: balancing the technical-political equation. 1st edn. Santa Fe, NM: OnWord Press.
Othman, A.A., Almaamari, A.F., Amin Al-Manmi, D.A.M., Liesenberg, V., Syed, E., Obaid, A.K. and Al-Quraishi, A.F. (2020) ‘GIS-based modeling for selection of dam sites in the Kurdistan region, Iraq’, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(4).
Saaty, R.W. (1987) ‘The Analytic Hierarchy Process – what it is and how it is used’, Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), pp. 161–176. Pergamon Journals Ltd.
Saaty, T.L. and Vargas, L.G. (1980) ‘Hierarchical analysis of behavior in competition: prediction in chess’, Behavioral Science, 25(3), pp. 180–191.
Sissakian, V.K. Geological map of Arbil and Mahabad quadrangles, sheets NJ-38-14 and NJ-38-15. State Establishment of Geological Survey and Mining, scale 1:250,000.
United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation (1976) Design of gravity dams. A Water Resources Technical Publication. Denver, Colorado: Bureau of Reclamation.
Vargas, R.V. (2010) ‘Using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to select and prioritize projects in a portfolio’, PMI Global Congress 2010 – North America. Washington, DC, USA.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Raparin Journal of Humanities (RJH)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.