Assessing University Final Examination Questions Written in English
College of Education -Shaqlawa as a Sample
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26750/Vol(11).No(5).Paper35الكلمات المفتاحية:
Accuracy, Assessment, Objectivity, Storability and Test Paper.الملخص
Test is regarded as a tool to measure the outcome of teaching and learning processes. There are other tools, but tests are still used to a great extent. The objective of the current study is to assess university final examination questions written in English, and College of Education-Shaqlawa has been selected as a sample. The test papers have been received from the Examination Committee of the college. Tests have several properties, but only three properties, namely accuracy, objectivity and scorability, have been chosen to be the criteria of the research. This is because the selected characteristics are general, while the left ones are specific to particular subjects. The procedure of the study is descriptive and analysis. The test papers have been analysed twice for reliability. The researchers have benefited from other researchers’ criteria. It has been detected that the test papers are objective to great extent. This is due to the test techniques that are used by the instructors. Unfortunately, some test papers have been found to be inaccurate. Inaccuracy has resulted from many areas such as grammatical mistakes and punctuation marks. Little attention has been given to the field of punctuation marks. Furthermore, some test papers have been detected to seem strange in terms of scorability. To clarify it, the mark distribution and the total mark of some test papers are not in agreement with the requirements. Finally, the conclusions, suggestions and references have been shown.
المراجع
Alderson, J. Charles. Language Test Construction and Evaluation. Cambridge: CUP, 1995.
Al-Hamash, Khalil I. and Hamdi Younis. Principles and Techniques of Teaching English as a Second Language. Baghdad: IDELTI, 1985.
Al-Hamash, Khalil I., , Adnan J. Al-Jubouri and Wa’il Al-Hiti. Testing Guide. Baghdad: IDELTI, 1982.
Al-Khuli, Mohammad Ali. Teaching English as Foreign Language. Amman: Dar Alfalah, 2000.
Al-Kubaisy, Amir B. Hamad. "The Influence of In-Service Teacher Training on English Teacher-Made Tests”. Unpublished MA thesis.University of Baghdad, 1979.
Bachman, Lyle F. and A. S. Palmer. Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: OUP, 1996.
Bachman, Lyle F.. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: OUP, 1990.
Birjandi, Parviz et al. Language Testing: A Concise Collection for Graduate Applicants, An Alternative Resolution to the Complications of Language Testing. Tehran: Shahid Mahdavi Publication, 2004.
Brown, James Dean. Testing in Language Programs. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents, 1996.
Genesee, Fred and John A. Upshur. Classroom-Based Evaluation in Second Language Education. Cambridge: CUP, 1996
Heaton, J. B.. Writing English Language Tests. London: Longman, 1988.Huges, Arthur. Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge: CUP, 1989.
Johnson, James A. and Louis D. Deprin. Elementary Student Teaching: Readings. London: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1971.
Mousavi, Seyyed Abbas. An Encyclopedic Dictionary of Language Testing. Tehran: Rahnama Press, 2009.
Richards, Jack C and Willy A. Renandya. Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthropology of Current Practice. Cambridge: CUP. 2002.
Valette, Rebecca. Modern Language Testing. 2nd ed. New York: Harcourt, 1977.
Weir, Cyril J. Communicative Language Testing. New York: Prentice, 1990.
التنزيلات
منشور
كيفية الاقتباس
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2024 Journal of University of Raparin
هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.