Analysis of the idioms of (head) in Kurdish language, from the perspective of cognitive linguistics

Authors

  • Nawzad Anwer Omer Department of Kurdish Language, Faculty of Education, Koya university, Koya, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26750/Vol(11).No(5).Paper7

Keywords:

Cognitive Linguistics, Conceptual Metaphor, Idiom, Source Field, Target Field.

Abstract

This study is entitled (Analysis of the idioms of (head) in Kurdish language, from the perspective of cognitive linguistics). Language is one of the most important human achievements and occupies a large space in human life. Therefore, since the ancient times, humans have paid attention to it and tried to understand its secrets.

Idioms are an important part of any language, and studying them helps us to understand the relationship between idioms and metaphors. The school of cognitive linguistics looks at idioms differently from all other linguistic schools. Other linguistic schools have studied the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic aspects of idioms and viewed them as fixed and inseparable structures and expressions. However, the cognitive linguists have a completely different view; they see idioms as conceptual metaphors and interpret every conceptual metaphor in terms of the conceptual matching and interaction between the source and target fields.

Our study is an interpretation of the idioms of (head) from the school of cognitive linguistics’ perspective, in light of the theory of conceptual metaphor, the interpretation of idioms has been conducted. In general, the study consists of the introduction, two chapters, the results and the list of references. The first chapter discusses the perception of both schools of ancient and cognitive linguistics for idioms as well as the theory of conceptual metaphor, types of conceptual metaphors and metaphorical interaction between the source and target fields. In the second chapter, the idioms of (head) have been analyzed according to the theory of conceptual metaphor, followed by the results and a list of references.

References

جواد، هۆشه‌نگ فاروق، (2020)، پوخته‌یه‌كی تیۆری میتافۆره‌ چه‌مكییه‌كان و په‌یڕه‌وكردنی به‌سه‌ر هه‌ندێ ئیدۆمی كوردیدا، گۆڤاری ئه‌كادیمیای كوردی ژماره‌ 49.

پیته‌ر هاڵبێرگ و زمانه‌وانانی تر،(2010)، ئاماده‌كردن و وه‌رگێرانی ئه‌نوه‌ر قادر محمد، مه‌ڵبه‌ندی كوردۆلۆجی، سلێمانی.

شیلان ئه‌حمه‌د، به‌هره ‌سلام (2020)، میتافۆره‌ چه‌مكییه‌كان له‌زماندا، گۆڤاری زانكۆی گه‌رمیان، به‌رگی7 ژماره‌ 1.

شێخانی، عبدالوهاب (2009)، فه‌رهه‌نگی ئیدیۆم له‌زمانی كوردیدا، چاپی یه‌كه‌م، چاپخانه‌ی خانی، دهۆك.

عباس، ئاشنا فارس (2022)،میتافۆر له‌شیعره‌كانی قوتابخانه‌ی باباندا توێژینه‌وه‌یه‌كی سیمانتیكی مه‌عریفی، نامه‌ی ماسته‌ر، زانكۆی سڵاحه‌ددین.

علی، به‌كر عومه‌ر، (2000)، میتافۆر له‌ ڕوانگه‌ی زمانه‌وانییه‌وه‌، نامه‌ی دكتۆرا، زانكۆی سلێمانی.

نبی، ڕێبوار ئه‌حمه‌د،(2015)، په‌یپێبردنی شاوه‌چه‌ له‌سیمانتیكی دركپێكردن له‌ زمانی كوردیدا، نامه‌ی ماجستێر، زانكۆی سۆران.

كمال، محمد،(2020)، فه‌لسه‌فه‌ی ئه‌زمونگه‌رایی، ده‌زگاى چاپ و په‌خشی سه‌رده‌م، سلێمانى.

الأزهر الزناد, (2009), نظريات السانية عرفنية, منشورات الاختلاف, دار محمد على للنشر.

البوعمران, محمد صالح, (2009), دراسات نظرية وتطبيقية فى علم الدلالة العرفانى, الطبعة الأولى, مطبعة دار نهى, صفاقس.

هاشمی، زهره،‌(1398)، نظرية استعارة مفهومى ازديدگاه‌ لیكاف و جانسون، شماره‌(12).

Kovecses, z.(2010), Metaphor:Aproctical introduction, Oxford university press.

Lakoff and Johnson,(1980), Metaphors we Live by, Chicago: The university of Chicago press.

VyVyan Evans and Melanie Grean,(2006), Cognaitive Linguistics: Acomplete Edinburgh University Press.

Published

2024-10-29

How to Cite

Anwer Omer, N. (2024). Analysis of the idioms of (head) in Kurdish language, from the perspective of cognitive linguistics. Journal of University of Raparin, 11(5), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.26750/Vol(11).No(5).Paper7

Issue

Section

Humanities & Social Sciences