Criteria
2 articles filed under this keyword.
Evaluation of PhD Thesis in the Department of Media Salahaddin University is evaluated according to research quality criteria
Roza Hamaweass Hamamerza, Jawad Niemat Hussein, Fuad Ali Ahmad
This research is entitled Evaluation of PhD Thesis in the Department of Media Salahaddin University is evaluated according to research quality criteria Research of the Department of Media, Salahaddin University The main problem of this study is the main question of whether theses Did they follow research quality criteria ? This research is descriptive and relies on an evaluation form Through a criterion for evaluating thesis of the most important outcomes that The research concluded that the evaluation criteria are to identify and draft titles It has been well ahead of other criteria and the average media eligibility of titles is at high, regarding the language of writing doctoral thesis reports, it has been found that language Academics used to write thesis reports in good evaluation criteria and the writing of theses was at a high level It was found that the evaluation criteria of “good” was the highest In identifying the problems of theses in the evaluation criteria The criterion of “good” was the highest compared to other criteria and the level of objectives was high.
Volume 8 · Issue 3 · September 2021Critical Thinking Based on Logic
Muslim Hassan Mohammed, Jutyar Ismael Jamal
Logic is the measure and framework of thinking. Critical thinking means meticulous, organized, and purposeful thinking. Critical thinkers are not always critics. Critical thinking plays a role in every behavior, argumentation, and decision. These are accomplished through dialogue, explanation, and observation, in accordance with logical measures. Dialogue and thinking belong to logic. Logic is a means to organize the ways of human thinking. Critical thinking is a skill honed and improved by training and work, given the fact that most people are not born with an inherent skill of thinking critically, but that thinking is often restricted within a limited circle. This contradicts with critical thinking.