Parliament
4 articles filed under this keyword.
Kamal Fuad's Role and Stance in the Kurdistan Parliament During its First and Transitional Cabinet (1992 - 2005) A Historical Study
Amanj Mohammedamin Abdullah, Dara Tawfeeq Kaka Amin
Researching intellectual and political figures is crucial for historical research. However, it can be challenging, especially if they have had a significant impact on their lives and played a significant role in their nation's liberation movement. Their activities and influences can foster positive relationships with their surroundings, leading to higher levels of success. Kamal Fouad, a Kurdish thinker, politician, linguist, and writer, is a patriotic figure with a positive attitude. The significance of this research stems from the fact that Kamal Fouad played an important role in a number of important laws and decisions during his tenure as Speaker of Parliament and Deputy Speaker of Parliament, including the drafting of the Kurdistan Region's constitution, the issuance of a federal decree for the Iraqi constitution, and the recognition of Anfal crimes and the chemical bombing of the Kurdish people as genocide. The research aims to present Kamal Fouad's role in the Kurdistan parliament and analyze his views on people's lives and livelihoods. It also examines his linguistic and academic fingerprints on the parliament's laws and decisions. In addition to descriptive and narrative methods, this study aims to objectively investigate events and attitudes through legislative discussions, which will yield significant results.
Volume 12 · Issue 5 · October 2025Decision-Making Skills Among Members of The Iraqi Kurdistan Parliament
Buhar Muhammad Karim, Omar Ibrahim Aziz
The aim of the current research is to identify the level of decision-making skills among members of the Iraqi Kurdistan Parliament, and the significance of the differences in them according to demographic variables (gender, age, nationality, educational level, years of service in Parliament). The research relied on the descriptive survey method, and the sample consisted of (95) male and female members selected from the members of the fifth session of the Iraqi Kurdistan Parliament, to whom the decision-making skills scale that had been prepared was applied, which in its final form consisted of (31) items. Its validity and reliability were verified. After analyzing the data using SPSS, the results showed that the level of decision-making skills among members of the Iraqi Kurdistan Parliament in general is high, and it was found that there are no statistically significant differences in decision-making skills attributed to the variables: gender, age, nationality, academic level, and years of service in Parliament. In light of the results included a number of recommendations for stakeholders and some suggestions for future researchers.
Volume 8 · Issue 2 · June 2021The Role of PDK and PUK in the Formation of Parliament and Government Cabinet Between (1992-2006)
Dilshad Siamend Shirawy, Mohammed Hussain Mohammed Shwani
In 1992, for the first time, the Kurdistan region of Iraq went through political and societal change like the formation of parliament and government cabinet. This research is a theoretical one on the role of PDK and PUK in the building of parliament and government cabinet between (1992-2006). This research analyses the role of the both parties in the formation of the parliament in 1992 and 2005, and the government cabinet from the first to fifth. Additionally, this research focuses on the division of power between the two parties during (1992-2005) then the research concluded by the main findings such as, the Role of the both parties in the building of parliament and the government cabinet from the first two the fifth in the region and sharing power in the (1,2,5) government cabinets.
Volume 7 · Issue 1 · January 2020Gender Differences in the Speech Events of Kurdistan Parliament
Dlvin Abdullah Sadiq, Salam Nihma Hakeem
This study tackles the differences between male and female MPs’ language in Kurdistan Parliament and the reasons behind such differences. The study investigates the extent and the type of gender differences between male and female MPs in Kurdistan and how these differences may lead to misunderstandings while debating. . In addition, the study highlights the MPs’ perspective on gender stereotypes and how such perspectives may affect their interactions. A quantitative method has been used to analyze the data of the study. First, an ethnographic description of Kurdistan Parliament according to Hymes's speaking framework was given, focusing on the setting, the participants and the act sequence. Second, a questionnaire was prepared as the data collection tool of the study. Based on the analysis of the collected data, it was found out that both male and female MPs strongly agreed that gender differences in language use could lead to misunderstandings. Moreover, MPs confirmed that the Kurdish society is patriarchal, and this leads to male dominance in most of the social interactions including parliamentary debates.