The Use of Discourse Markers in Kurdish EFL Undergraduate Students’ Writing: at Raparin University.

Rayan  Saleem Khalid; Khalid  Ali Abdalla

doi:10.26750/4pyycf42

المؤلفون

Rayan Saleem Khalid Department of English, College of Basic Education, University of Raparin, Ranya, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
Khalid Ali Abdalla Presidency of the University of Raparin, Directorate of Language and Development Center. Ranya, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26750/4pyycf42

الكلمات المفتاحية:

Discourse Markers Frequency, Coherence and Cohesion Challenges in Writing, Halliday and Hassan’s Cohesion Model, Kurdish Third Year Undergraduate Students.

الملخص

The current study examines discourse markers which are important language devices that enhance coherence in writing. Coherence and cohesion in Kurdish EFL Undergraduate Students’ Writing are essential components that contribute to clarity and effectiveness. The aim of this study is to explore the extent to which Kurdish EFL undergraduate students at Raparin University, third-year morning class, utilize DMs in their writing. Moreover, to identify the difficulties that learners face and the most frequently used DMs. This study adopts Halliday and Hassan's cohesion model for the process of data analysis collected at Raparin University. For this purpose, mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative) are used in the process of data collection. As well as survey is used as a tool for this investigation. Fifty participants from Raparin University participated in answering survey questions.

The results show that undergraduate students exhibit various kinds of frequency in utilizing additional types of DMs while writing an essay. Due to a lack of understanding about how to employ adversative, temporal, and causal forms of discourse markers, students overuse additional types of DMs, and their writing lacks cohesion and coherence to write an academic essay.

المراجع

Afzaal, M., Hu, K., Chishti, M.I. and Imran, M., 2019. A study of Pakistani English newspaper texts: An application of Halliday and Hasan’s Model of Cohesion: A discourse analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(5), pp.78-88.

Alahmed, S. and Kırmızı, O., 2021. The use of discourse markers in second language writing of Iraqi undergraduate students. Eurasian Journal of English Language and Literature, 3(2), pp.357-385.

Anwar, M.N. and Ahmed, 2016 N., STUDENTS’DIFFICULTIES IN LEARNING WRITING SKILLS IN SECOND.

Awla, S.Q. and Hamad, K.A., 2023. Kurdish language interference in learning English as a foreign language: Grammatical negative transfer. Twejer Journal, 6(1), pp.2018-2061.

Aziz, A.R. and Nuri, R.B.M., 2021. Iraqi Kurd EFL Learners' Uses of Conjunctive Adverbials in Essays. Arab World English Journal, 12(2), pp.222-237.

Baştuğ, M. and Demirtaş Şenel, G., 2020. Her ses/harf için özel uygulamalı ilk okuma ve yazma uygulamalı el kitabı (6. baskı).

CRANE, P.A., 2006. Texture in text: a discourse analysis of a news article using Halliday and Hasan's model of cohesion. 名古屋外国語大学外国語学部紀要, (30), pp.131-156.

Fareh, S., Jarad, N. and Yagi, S., 2020. How well can Arab EFL learners adequately use discourse markers. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 20(2), pp.85-98

Field, Y. and Oi, Y.L.M., 1992. A comparison of internal conjunctive cohesion in the English essay writing of Cantonese speakers and native speakers of English. RELC journal, 23(1), pp.15-28.

Haji, N., 2024. Major Writing Difficulties Faced by Kurdish Learners of EFL in Academic Writing Classes. Twejer Journal, 7(1), pp.1230-1239.

Halliday, M.A.K., 2006. Linguistic studies of text and discourse (Vol. 2). A&C Black.

Hama, F.M., 2021. An investigation into the difficulties of using transitional words in Kurdish EFL students’ writing at the university level. UKH Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), pp.107-117.

Haninda, M. and Bram, B., 2022. Academic writing of EFL students’ undergraduate theses: A discourse marker analysis. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(1), pp.109-114.

Hayatolain, S. and Ganji, M., 2023. Investigating the instruction and usage frequency of transition markers in grammar textbooks: Focusing on English for Academic Purposes Books. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), pp.84-105.

Kolln, M., 1999. Cohesion and coherence. Evaluating writing, pp.93-113.

Lestari, H.S., 2020. An Analysis Discourse Marker Use In Students Undergraduate Thesis Of English Deparment Of IAIN Metro In The Academic Year 2019/2020 (Doctoral dissertation, IAIN Metro).

Lu, H., 2023. A study of discourse markers employed in college English writing by non-English majors. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 157, p. 01007). EDP Sciences.

Ludji, I., Hambandima, E.S. and Christiani, Y.N., 2022. Cohesive devices used in students’ argumentative essay; A discourse analysis. Voices of English Language Education Society, 6(1), pp.14-24.

Muhammed, A. and Ameen, C., 2014. Idea transformation between L1 and L2 as a writing problem for Kurd EFL learners at different university levels. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 5(7), pp.353-359.

Mustafa, S.H. and Hamad, K.A., 2024. Questioning the Status of Moral Education in the Context of EFL in Kurdistan: A Critique Review. Twejer Journal, 7(1), pp.1125-1144.

Omar, J.A., 2018. Kurdish EFL learners’ conceptual transfer in L+ writing. The Journal of Education, Culture, and Society, 9(1), pp.163-172.

Omar, J.A., Hamad, S.H. and Saleem, B.Q., 2020. Grammatical cohesion skill for EFL learners: The case of university level Kurdish learners of English. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(4).

Raputri, E., Pratama, H. and Hartono, R., 2022. Evaluating the use of discourse markers in selected English education journal articles. English Education Journal, 12(1), pp.1-9.

Rullyanti, M., 4. Cohesive Devices and Students’ Academic Writing Quality. ACADEMIC, p.59.

Sanders, T.J. and Noordman, L.G., 2000. The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse processes, 29(1), pp.37-60.

Saupe, J.L., 1961. Some useful estimates of the Kuder-Richardson Formula Number 20 reliability coefficient. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 21(1), pp.63-71.

Soleimani, H. and Rasekh, A.E., 2010. Transferability of Writing through Languages: A Study of English and Persian. Intercultural Communication Studies XIX, 1, pp.236-246.

Suleiman, H.H. and Seyyedi, K., 2020. Additive discourse markers in English journal articles written by Kurdish and English native speakers: A corpus-based study. Available at SSRN 3528326.

Tadayyon, M. and Vasheghani Farahani, M., 2017. Exploring discourse markers used in academic papers: A comparative corpus-based inquiry of Iranian and English native writers. Iranian EFL Journal, 13(2), pp.130-150.

Yayli, D., 2011. From genre awareness to cross-genre awareness: A study in an EFL context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(3), pp.121-129.