Theoretical Analysis of the U.S. Foreign Policy Towards Kurds in Syria After 2011
Keywords:US Foreign Policy; Syrian Kurds; Middle East; ISIS ; Syrian Crisis.
The United States' new foreign policy, which includes abandoning America's Kurdish friends and a new strategy on how the US should execute military interventions, as well as the "America First" ethos, has triggered a humanitarian and military catastrophe for Syrian Kurds. Despite the prevalence of study on American strategy in Syria and towards Syrian Kurds, there is a noticeable lack of comprehensive research explaining and evaluating the growing connections. This paper argues that deciphering these patterns necessitates a deep understanding of regional politics and a thorough engagement with the vast IR research. In this context, it is essential to look at the nature, limitations, and constraints of the Kurdish-US relationship, which is the Kurds' most powerful ally. For the present study, a theoretical framework is chosen to analyse US foreign policy comprehensively. This is a qualitative research report based on a case study. The case for this paper is the United States' foreign policy toward Syrian Kurds, as seen through several international theories, particularly realism and liberalism. The suggested study aims to explain why the US overlooked Syrian Kurds at the start of the Syrian crisis, why the US worked with and backed Syrian Kurds or SDF till 2019, and why the US abandoned or deserted the Syrian Kurds after a foreign policy shift. To sum up, scholarly reports show mixed results, with some claiming that the US decision to abandon Syrian Kurds was well-informed. In contrast, others suggest that if the decision is made without caution, it will do more harm than good to America's long-term ally, who played a critical role in the fight against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.
Al-Istrabadi, F. (2018). Regional constraints on the US confrontation of ISIS. Brookings Institution Press, 173-198
Al-Masri, A., & Salahi, R. (2022). The Biden Administration's Syria policy sets a path towards disengagement. Here’s why it's problematic. Atlantic Council. January, 21.
Audino, E. (2017). 5 reasons for US to support an independent Kurdistan. Washington Times Advocacy Department and Kurdistan, 24, 20-21.
Ayton, M. (2020). Amid US uncertainty in Syria, Kurdish YPG eyes bolstering ties with Russia. Atlantic Council.
Aziz, G. A. A. (2019). The Saudi–US Alliance challenges and resilience, 2011: 2019. Review of Economics and Political Science.
Aziz, L. (2020). The Syrian Kurds in the US foreign policy: Long-term strategy or tactical ploy. Centre d’étude des Crises et Conflits Internationaux.
Barkey, H. J. (2016). Syria’s dark shadow over US-Turkey relations. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 14(4), 25-36.
Borger, J. (2019). Trumps Turkey deal hands power to Ankara and leaves Syrian Kurds
for dead. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/oct/18/trumps-turkey-deal-hands-power-to-ankara-and-leaves-syrian-kurds-for-dead. [Accessed on May 11, 2022].
Brendan O’Leary, “The Kurds, the Four Wolves, and the Great Powers.” The Journal of Politics 80, January 2018, pp.353–66
Byman, D., & Moller, S. B. (2016). The United States and the Middle East: interests, risks, and costs. Sustainable security: rethinking American national security strategy, 272-273.
Collard, R. 2015. “Militants are Hit in Battle for Kobane,” Washington Post, SECTION-A, A08, September 28
Cragin, R. K. (2020). Tactical partnerships for strategic effects: recent experiences of US forces working by, with, and through surrogates in Syria and Libya. Defence Studies, 20(4), 318-335.
Darwich, M. (2021). Alliance politics in the post-2011 Middle East: advancing theoretical and empirical perspectives. Mediterranean Politics, 26(5), 635-656.
Desoli, F. (2015). L’Avant-et L’après-Kobané: Défis et Opportunités pour les Kurdes de Syrie. Outre-Terre, (3), 273-285.
Federici, V. (2015). The Rise of Rojava. The SAIS Review of International Affairs, 35(2), 81-90.
Feltman, J., & Batlan, H. (2021). The United States Needs a New Syria Policy. Brookings. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2021/01/29/the-united-states-%20needs-a-new-syria-policy. [Accessed on 11 May, 2022].
Ford, R. S. (2021). U.S. strategy in Syria has failed. Foreign Affairs, January 25.
Galbraith, P. (2019). The Betrayal of the Kurds. The New York Review of Books, 21.
Garner, Jay. 2017. “Key Factors Beckon Support for Iraqi Kurds.” In Washington Times Advocacy Department and Kurdistan, The Kurdistan Region: Strategic US Ally in a Tough Neighborhood.Specialreport,July27,.http://twtmedia.washtimes.com/media/misc/2017/07/26/KurdistanReport_Final.pdf
Glavin, T. (2014). No friends but the mountains: The fate of the Kurds. World Affairs. 177(1), 57.
Gunes, C., & Lowe, R. (2015). The impact of the Syrian war on Kurdish politics across the Middle East. London: Chatham House.
Gunter, M. M. (2011). The Five Stages of American Foreign Policy towards the Kurds. Insight Turkey, 13(2).
Gunter, M. M. (2015). Iraq, Syria, ISIS and the Kurds: Geostrategic concerns for the US and Turkey. Middle East Policy, 22(1), 102-111.
Harriet Allsopp, 2015. The Kurds of Syria political Parties and Identity in the Middle East, London. New York: L.B. tauris.
Hawramy, F. (2014). Peshmerga forces heave ISIS away from Mount Sinjar. The Guardian, 21.
Hiltermann, J. (2018). The Kurds Once Again Face American Abandonment. The Atlantic.
Hirsh, M., (2019). The Problem with America’s Syria Policy Isn’t Trump. It’s Syria. Foreign Policy.
Hubbard, B. (2018). Syria's Kurds, Feeling Betrayed by the US, Ask Assad Government for Protection. The New York Times. December, 28.
Hubbard, B., Savage, C., Schmitt, E., & Kingsley, P. (2019). Abandoned by U.S. in Syria, Kurds Find New Ally in American Foe. The New York Times. October, 13.
Humud, C. E., Blanchard, C. M., & Nikitin, M. B. D. (2016). Armed conflict in Syria: Overview and US response.
İsmail, S. A. R. I. The United States Foreign Policy Towards Kurds. Ortadoğu Etütleri, 11(2), 278-299.
Kajjo, S. (2020). Syrian Kurds: Rising from the Ashes of Persecution. In H. Moodrick-Even Khen, N. Boms, & S. Ashraph (Eds.), The Syrian War: Between Justice and Political Reality (pp. 268-286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Karami, H., & Romano, D. (2018). Sub-State Actors and Trump’s Foreign Policy in the Middle East: The Case of Kurdish Forces in Iraq and Syria. Trump and the Middle East.
Krieg, A. (2017). Trump and the Middle East: ‘Barking Dogs Seldom Bite’. Insight Turkey, 19(3), 139-158.
Küçükkeleş, M., & Mankoff, J. (2014). The Kurdish Question and US-Turkish Relations in the Changing Middle East. Atlantic Council.
Lang, H. (2019). Syria's northeast still at risk after "safe zone" deal. . [Online] Axios. Retrieved from: https://www.axios.com/2019/10/23/syria-northeast-risk-after-safe-zone-deal. [Accessed 13 Dec. 2019].
MacFarlane, S. N. (2006). The ‘Rain BRICs: is Russia an emerging power? International affairs, 82(1), 41-57.
Maguire, D. (2020). A Perfect Proxy? The United States-Syrian Democratic Forces Partnership. Proxy War Project Conflict Series.
Mayer, K. R. (2014). Executive power in the Obama administration and the decision to seek Congressional authorization for a military attack against Syria: Implications for theories of unilateral action. Utah L. Rev., 821.
Mazza–Hilway, R. (2019). Regime change, deferred: Regarding United States’ foreign policy in Syria. Political Analysis, 20(1), 2.
Mearsheimer, J. J., & Alterman, G. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. WW Norton & Company.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and Expanded from" Case Study Research in Education.". Jossey-Bass Publishers, 350 Sansome St, San Francisco, CA 94104.
O’Leary, B. (2018). The Kurds, the four wolves, and the great powers. The Journal of Politics, 80 (1), 353-366
Olson, R. W., 2010. “Denied a State, Winning a Region: Comparing Kurdish Nationalism after 1918 and 2003.” In Robert Lowe and Gareth Stan field, eds., The Kurdish Policy Imperative. London: Chatham House
Pettersson, E. (2020). An analysis of foreign involvement within the Syria conflict: Why had the United States and Russia a foreign interest in Syria. (Dissertation). Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-90883.
Plakoudas, S. (2017). The Syrian Kurds and the Democratic Union Party: The Outsider in the Syrian War. Mediterranean Quarterly, 28(1), 99-116.
Rogers, K., Callimachi, R., & Cooper, H. (2019). Trump Declares ISIS ‘100%’Defeated in Syria.‘100% Not True,’Ground Reports Say. New York Times.
Sarı, İ. (2019). "The United States Foreign Policy Towards Kurds". Ortadoğu Etütleri, 11
Schmidinger, T. (2018). Rojava: Revolution, war and the future of Syria's Kurds (Vol. 129). London: Pluto Press.
Sherlock, R., Y. Pasha, and M. Samaan. 2014. “How the US Took Back Kobane.” The Sunday
Teke, R. T. (2020). The Kurds of Northern Syria in Western Media: The BBC and VOA coverage (2014-2018) (Master's thesis, Middle East Technical University).
Thornton, R. (2015). Problems with the Kurds as proxies against Islamic State: insights from the siege of Kobane. Small wars & insurgencies, 26(6), 865-885.
Wimmen, H. (2017). The US joins the Turkey-PKK fight in northern Syria. Middle East Eye.[online] Available at https://www. Crisis group. org/middle-east-north-Africa/eastern Mediterranean/Syria/us-joins-turkey-PKK-fight-northern-Syria. [Accessed on 11 May,2022].
Wimmen, H. (2017) US joins Turkey-PKK fight northern Syria. Crisis Group, https://www.
Zaideh, R. (2017). Raqqa’s Liberation and US Policy in Syria. Arab Center Washington DC. Retrieved from https://arabcenterdc.org/resource/raqqas-liberation-and-us-policy-in-syria/. [Accessed on 11 May 2022].
Ziadeh, R. (2009). The Kurds in Syria: Fueling separatist movements in the region? (Vol. 31). United States Institute of Peace.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of University of Raparin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.