The democratic deficit in the European Union (EU)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26750/paperKeywords:
European Union, Democratic Deficit, Legitimacy, HixAbstract
ABSTRACT:
Changing the nature of the EU through treaties from economic to political has raised many questions concerning the democratic deficit. The main question is whether there is a democratic deficit in the EU? if so, how could it be reduced? This article addresses the theories of some notable EU Scholars regarding the democratic deficit and analyses their solutions for the issue. The first section examines the concept of democratic deficit in the light of the arguments of Hix, Majone, and Moravcsik. According to Hix, the EU suffers from a lack of accountability, weak parliament, and indirect legitimacy. In contrast, Majone and Moravcsik believe that the EU does not need to be legitimized in a similar way of democratic states because it is considered as a regulatory state. The second section studies the democratic deficit between the redistributive policies where there are winners and losers similar to majoritarian, and regulative policies where there are no losers even if all are not winners. The final section explores the solutions provided by the abovementioned scholars with highlighting the view of Hix. Accordingly, the scholars unanimously agree on the existence of democratic deficits to some extent as the EU acts like both intergovernmental and supranational organisation concurrently.
References
Beetham, David and Christopher Lord (1998) Legitimacy and the European Union, (London: Longman) Follesdal, Andreas and
Dahl, Robert A. (1998). On Democracy. Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert A. 1999. Can International Organizations be Democratic? A Sceptics View. In Democracy's Edges, ed. Shapiro, I. & Hacker-Cordon, C., 19-37. Cambridge University Press.
Hix S, (1997) ‘Executive Selection in the European Union: Does the Commission President Investiture Procedure Reduce the Democratic Deficit?’ European Integration online Papers (EIoP) Vol. 1 (1997) N°021;
Hix S, (2002). Linking National Politics to Europe, (London: Foreign Policy Centre).
Hix S, and Marsh M, (2005) .Punishment or Protest? Understanding European Parliament Elections, Paper presented at the biennial conference of the European Union Studies Association, Austin, Texas. April
Hix, Simon (2008) .what’s wrong with the European Union and How to fix it. (London: Polity Press).
Hix, Simon and Bjørn Høyland (2011) .The Political System of the European Union, 3rd edition, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Majone, G. (2002a), “The European Commission: The Limits of Centralization and the Perils of Parliamentarization”, Governance, Vol. 15, No. 3, PP375–92.
Majone, Giandomenico. (1998). Europe’s ‘Democratic Deficit’: The Question of Standards. European Law Journal 4: 5-28.
Majone, Giandomenico. (2006). The Common Sense of European Integration. Journal of European Public Policy 13: 607-26.
Moravcsik, A. (2002) ‘In Defense of the “Democratic Deficit”: Reassessing the Legitimacy of the European Union’. Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 603–34
Moravcsik, A. (2008) .The Myth of Europe’s “Democratic Deficit, Intereconomics, Journal of European Economic Policy.43(6) PP 331-40.
Scharpf, F.W (1999) .Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic, Oxford University Press.
Schmitter, Philippe C. (2003). Making Sense of the EU. Democracy in Europe and Europe’s Democratization. Journal of Democracy 14: 71-85.
Simon Hix (2006) ‘Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: a response to Majone and Moravcsik’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), pp533-62
Weiler, Joseph H. H., Haltern, Ulrich R. Mayer, Franz. 1995. European Democracy and its Critique: Five Uneasy Pieces. European University Institute.
Zweifel, T., (2002) .Who is without Sin Cast the First Stone: the EU Democratic Deficit in Comparison, Journal of European Public Policy, Volume 9 Issue 5, PP 812-40
